Learning Objectives:

  1. Define the importance of posture, stability, and mobility and explain how they relate to one another.
  2. Understand how posture, stability, and mobility independently and collectively affect movement.
  3. Identify the bio-mechanical components of postural alignment and how they facilitate stability and mobility.
  4. Provide examples of how faulty posture, stability, and mobility adversely affect each other and influence body function and structure.

3 women performing exercises to develop better posture, mobility and stabilityFigure 1. Posture, Stability and Mobility Triangle

The Importance of Posture

Let’s begin by exploring the significance and importance of posture.

Posture conjures many images in our minds. Perhaps most commonly is the one of our moms telling us to sit up straight, which from a musculoskeletal perspective has much merit. When we sit up straight or stand tall in “military posture,” we align our joints in a manner that minimizes compressive joint forces and soft tissue loads (Saunders, 1985).

The “neutral spine” is the most typical term we hear to identify posture, which is simply describing how we align our spine (see Figure 2). In this position the center of gravity bisects our spinal curves, which has several benefits and advantages.

images depicting man with poor posture and man with good posture

Figure 2. Neutral Spine

image of neutral spine position

Figure 3. Erector Spinae

A stable and energy-efficient alignment requires the least amount of muscle contraction to support, reduces shear and compressive loads on the spine, provides the most optimal position for muscles to both support and move the spinal joints, and establishes the ideal alignment for locomotion and other upright activities (McGill, 2002). The neutral spine is a perfect example of how posture dictates muscle function from a perspective of muscle fiber direction. When observing the lumbar components of the Erector Spinae (Figure 3) in a neutral spine, these muscles are viewed to have an oblique angle of approximately 45 degrees from their origin on the sacrum to their respective vertebral attachments (McGill 2006). When the spine is flexed, the muscle line of action changes to a more parallel alignment that results in a reduction in its ability to support the spine from damaging anterior shear forces that occur when lifting with a rounded spine (McGill 2006). The spinal curves directly influence the fiber direction of these back extensor muscles groups that are vital to control vertebral joint position and mitigate harmful forces on the spine. Hence, posture dictates the load bearing ability of the spine.

Posture is also relevant beyond the spine as the extremities too have a role. For example, the position of the ankles and knees can influence body alignment and impact force production (Starrett 2013). Overpronation is a very good example that we see all too often in the sports medicine world. Overpronation in the lower extremities contributes to a variety of orthopedic overuse injuries, such as: Achilles tendinitis, runner’s knee, patella tendinitis, etc. Applying this concept to posture, we see that athletes who overpronate create an environment of excessive internal rotation and valgus that affect both knee and hip positioning (Figure 4).

example of knee valgus

Figure 4. Knee Valgus

Postural faults (as evidenced in this example of overpronation) are not only static, but dynamic. The position of one joint, whether stationary or in motion, directly impacts the joint position above and below. When athletes overpronate, the knees tend to be more inclined to buckle inward, compromising their ability to effectively shock absorb and control body weight, as well as create force necessary for the propulsion phase of running.

It’s worth reiterating: posture dictates muscle function and this applies not only to the spine but to all of the joints – including the lower extremities. When the ankles, knees and hips fall into poor alignment, the ability to produce force and support joint position is compromised (Starrett, 2013). Much like a car with poor shocks, it is just a matter of time until something gives. The body joints must stack up well or posture is weakened and things break down. From this perspective it is easy to understand why posture should always be the foundation upon which we build movement skills.

Stability as a Concept

suspension bridge

Figure 5. Suspension Bridge

Stability is the next concept worth breaking down into its most simple element.

I often am surprised how often this term is thrown around the fitness industry, yet when we really try to define it we find vagueness in its meanings. I personally like to think of it from an architectural or structural engineering perspective in which it can simply be interchanged with the concept of  “support”.

diagram of spine ligaments

Figure 6. Spine Ligaments

If you look at a suspension bridge, the support comes from the building foundation, the struts or beams, and the cables (Figure 5). In comparison, if we look at the spine, the ligaments compare nicely to the cables (Figure 6) and the vertebrae stacked up on top of each other and sitting on the pelvis are the foundation (Figure 7). The most significant difference in this analogy is that the spine, in addition to its passive support structures, is influenced by muscles that exert active forces upon its joints to impart tension and stiffness. These muscles are regulated by a finely tuned nervous system that sends and receives information from the spinal ligaments and muscles to provide a stability framework that is highly advanced and capable of tremendous amounts of structural support (Figure 8).

image of lower back vertebrae and pelvis

Figure 7. Vertebrae and Pelvis

In this manner, external forces across the joints of the spine can be balanced and adjusted to mitigate compressive loads and establish equilibrium (Morris, 2006). This concept that entails the balance of forces to control joint alignment and position is perhaps the most accurate description of stability as it applies to the body.

diagram depicting the nervous system pathway

Figure 8. Nervous System Pathway

At this point, I hope you can see the connection between posture and stability. When we assume good posture, the joints of our body are aligned structurally to create stability. Our joints are stacked to provide optimal surface contact with tension on our ligaments equally balanced on all sides. The alignment of muscles is also ideal to both support and move the lever arms of our body. On the other end of the spectrum, the stability components entail healthy ligaments that can withstand tensile forces to provide the skeletal system with the support it needs to maintain ideal posture, both statically and dynamically, in all planes of motion. A finely tuned nervous system also regulates muscular contractions on all sides of the joints of the body to further create the support necessary to maintain ideal posture. From this viewpoint, it easy to understand why when posture breaks down so does stability, and vice versa. The two are highly dependent upon one another to create an efficient structural and mechanical body movement system.

Mobility Bridging the Gap

The last element of this triad, and just as important and dependent on the others, is mobility.

Mobility perhaps is the easiest element to define. Quite simply, it is the ability to move freely. Soft tissue structures that have adaptively shortened and developed adhesions over time can restrict mobility and lead to dysfunctional movements. Typically, the connective tissue of muscle, the fascia, and joint capsules all play a significant role (Starrett, 2013). It is beyond the scope of this article to review the diagnostics and differentiating factors between these structures, but we can appreciate that the source of any soft tissue restriction affects all the other structures and the overall quality of body movement. For example, the hip capsule will impede the ability of the hip to extend if the anterior aspect has shortened and developed adhesions. The lack of hip extension over time will also affect the hip flexor muscles and anterior fascia fibers crossing the hip joint, thereby reinforcing the limited hip extension. We must consider that imitations of mobility usually involve multiple soft tissue structures and that they must be addressed with a variety of soft tissue mobilization techniques and stretching strategies (Starrett, 2013).

Perhaps even more important is to recognize the relationship that mobility has with posture and stability. In many cases, we lose mobility in our joints and muscles because of poor posture that leads to a lack of stability and vice versa – as already discussed. The expression, “proximal stability equals distal mobility” is a two-way street, which also implies that “distal mobility equals proximal stability.”

If we have a stable core that can keep the spine still and in alignment, then distal joint mechanics are improved to maintain mobility through the hip and shoulder girdles. Vice versa, if we can keep our shoulders and hips fully mobile in all planes of motion (whether in daily life activities, exercise training, or sport), then we improve the ability to keep our spines stable and quiet.

Posture is the direct link to mobility and stability as we are most stabile when we maintain good posture and we have more range of motion in our joints. Simply try to lift your arm over your head in a forward, slouched position as opposed to standing tall, shoulders back, head straight. Mobility is always greater when we take advantage of the natural postural alignment of the body.


Posture, stability, and mobility provide the blue prints of movement and are highly connected to and dependent on one another. The foundation of all movement begins with posture and is applicable to both static and dynamic conditions. Postural alignment to move the body lever arms efficiently, while mitigating loads on our joints and soft tissues, can only be achieved when there is sufficient mobility and stability. Contrarily, a body that lacks stability will default into poor posture that will inevitably have adverse effects on the body’s mobility structures.


McGill, S.M. (2002). Low back disorders: Evidence based prevention and rehabilitation, Second Edition, Human Kinetics Publishers, Champaign, IL.

McGill, S.M. (2006). Ultimate back fitness and performance, Third Edition, Wabuno Publishers, Backfitpro Inc., Waterloo. Ontario, Canada

Morris, C. (2006). Low back syndromes, integrated clinical management,  McGraw-Hill Companies, New York.

Saunders, D. (1985). Evaluation, treatment, and prevention of musculoskeletal disorders, Viking Press Inc., Minneapolis, MN.

Starrett, K. (2013). Becoming a supple leopard, Victoria Belt Publishing Inc., Las Vegas, NV.

Bill Fabrocini, PT, CSCS

Bill Fabrocini, PT, CSC is a clinical specialist in orthopedic physical therapy and a sports performance training coach. Mr. Fabrocini has also written numerous articles that have been published in prominent journals including the National Strength and Conditioning Journal and the American Council on Exercise Certified News. Learn more about Mr. Fabrocini here.